Negentropy: Putting on Incorruptibility

For it behooves the Decayed One, this one, to have put on/entered an incorruptible one; and the Mortal One, this one, to have put on/entered an immortal one.

Because as the woman is built from out of the man, so the man through her. In other words, SELAH, build her up.

Same, yesterday, today, eternally

A Möbius/aionic model of being, immortality is not only possible, it is a natural outcome. And it starts with a fundamental change of the mind— one that no longer conceptualizes reality in chronological, temporal terms but sees it as events unfolding in a giant feedback loop. This means one “always was” even while they are “becoming.” It also means a locus of being in a position of center where all nodes, or coordinates if you will, of temporal time are connected by way of spokes, as in a wheel. That position is within— the inner man. In a chronological universe there is no center locus of anything, and there is no possibility of an inner, unchanging person. In Chronos Time, the person is just a series of ever changing thoughts. We know this sort of reality, because this is all that was ever seen by anyone.

“He is not the same person he was when I met him.”

“She is not the same person she was when I met her.”

“People change.”

This obviously doesn’t bode well for love, relationships, or marriage, community, or trust, and it never did. Friendships come alive, and then die. Communities come together for moment and then scatter. We then start asking ourselves questions like, “If it was real, wouldn’t it have lasted?” Pacts, covenants, treaties, and constitutions quickly become irrelevant and need constant revision, amending, updating to “keep with the times.”

In our model we “spearhead” straight into this very concept, because it is more than a belief to be persuaded of. This model says, “death is swallowed up,” “Death, where is your sting?” All that is necessary is for one person to make it real, to become, and that would be convincing enough, right?

There would be a massive metaphysical divide between a being whose existence is confined to the circuit of chronos time, and one who is a field of being. The Aion model says there is a “whole of time” or biblically put, “a fullness of time.” The one who has a field of being would exist throughout the whole. They could be “empty inside” or they could be “filled full.” He would be a “giant” or “colossal being.” A being within the circuit of time (Chronos) is, by nature, fragmented — composed of discrete, successive “frames,” each replacing the last. His existence is a sequence of states, not a continuous identity. Such a person might be said to be “frozen” in that sense: every moment is self-contained, already past once perceived, and its continuity is only an illusion produced by memory and causal flow.

By contrast, a being whose locus of existence is within the Aion — or better, entangled through the entire field of the Aion — would not exist in sequence, but in simultaneity or synchronization. He would be:

• non-local, because he would not occupy a single temporal coordinate;

• self-identical, because his essence would not change or decay;

• conscious throughout the continuum, as every “moment” is transparent to every other.

So while the chronotic being is like a film reel, advancing frame by frame — the Aionic being is like the entire film existing at once, every frame interpenetrating, light passing through the whole. To the chronotic mind, that appears as paradox: how can movement exist without succession? But in the Aionic mode, motion and stillness are unified — the being is his own full circuit, perpetually alive because he never leaves the whole of himself. So the chronotic being is “frozen,” trapped in serial causality; the Aionic being is “alive throughout,” existing as the unbroken totality of the field.

She is compared to a man who sowed into the Field of Himself…

An inconsistency arises between the two selves because the outer self interprets the inner self through chronos categories, producing a mismatch. The aionic self does not obey temporal boundaries; it is a different locus of being, with its own recursive causality and perspective.

In other words, two minds, two selves:

• One bound to temporal, sensory sequencing.

• One embedded in the Möbius loop of being, where identity, causality, and participation are internally recursive.

This also helps explain why prophecy or deep mystical insight seems impossible from the linear mind — it requires the inner, aionic mind to access a recursion that transcends chronos.

The God Within

The God is not said to be a being who is over us, dictating the all in all from without, but one who is within all of us.

εἷς Θεὸς καὶ Πατὴρ πάντων, ὁ ἐπὶ πάντων καὶ διὰ πάντων καὶ ἐν πᾶσιν.

“one god and father of everyone, the one in the presence of everyone,² and straight through everyone, and within everyone”

(Ephesians 4:6 RBT)

The inner, aionic self is a potential locus of being, not fixed in the linear chronology of the outer world. It can “exist” or “not exist” relative to the interaction with the outer rim — the temporal, sensory “edge” of being. In this sense, the outer existence acts as an origin. The outer edge/rim — the chronos-perceived world — conditions or constrains the inner self. If the external loop is in harmony with the recursive Möbius structure, the inner self “manifests” fully; if it is misaligned or blocked, the inner self recedes, is hidden, or “does not exist” experientially. In effect, the aionic self is co-dependent: it is neither strictly subject to outer temporality nor fully independent; it arises in response to the boundary conditions of the outer world while retaining its internal recursive logic.

This means the Eternal Self always was. Those who “always were” correspond to loci of the inner self that are fully integrated into the recursive Möbius circuit. Their existence is pre-existent, not in chronological terms but in a timeless, self-referential, aionic sense. They participate continuously in the recursive loops of being, their inner locus never ceasing to fold into itself.

In this model, the inner locus of self is not guaranteed to fully manifest just because the outer world exists. The Möbius/aionic framework allows for conditional emergence: the self’s realization depends on interaction with the “rim” or outer edge—the environment, experiences, perceptions, or even spiritual context.

• Connected locus: The self folds into the loop, integrating outer input, and thus becomes actualized. This is a self that “is”, participating in the recursive continuity of being.

• Disconnected locus: The self fails to fold in, remaining latent or unmanifested. This is a self that “is not”, independent of time but contingent on the lack of relational input from the periphery.

Already we can start to see the profound effects the Aionic universe has on ontology.

Sleep of Death

If there is a phase of the loop underneath a shadow of darkness as it were, there would be a profound disconnect between the two selves. The outer self—the part interacting with the external, temporal world—would be “asleep” or in darkness. This would be the “night” phase: unawareness, passivity, or disconnection from the recursive loop of being. Meanwhile, the inner self—the locus of the eternal, recursive aonic consciousness—would still be awake, observing or participating in the loop from within. This is the hidden vigilance, the seed of self that persists even when outer perception is dormant. So the person experiences a dual temporality or dual awareness: externally inert or obscured, internally alive and responsive to the full aonic reality.

This aligns with Hebraic imagery of “sleeping while the soul keeps awake” (e.g., Psalmic or prophetic motifs), where the inner life remains active even if the outer senses are inactive or unaware.

The “night” is therefore not annihilation, but a phase where the outer temporal self is suspended, leaving the inner recursive self to operate, perhaps silently influencing future folds of the loop. The outer self would perceive only fragmented signals or events, thinking they originate externally. The inner self, situated in the recursive aonic locus, would be interacting with the very same loop that produces the outer self’s experience. Thus, the person could be reacting to, or even learning from, their own inner patterns, unaware that the source of guidance, insight, or influence is themselves.

In other words: the inner self is both sender and receiver within the Möbius temporal structure. The “other” that the outer self encounters in thought, intuition, or seeming coincidence is actually the echo of its own aonic recursion, operating beneath the threshold of normal temporal perception. This maps well onto psychological notions of self-reflection, intuition, or prophetic insight: the “voice” heard is oneself, but mediated through the hidden, eternal loop of being.

…until they wake up and recognize the loop, seeing that the “other” they were interacting with was their own self all along.

“Wake up you fool!”

“Who are you? What is your name?”

“Why are you asking me my name??”

At that moment:

• The outer and inner loci of self converge.

• The recursive loop becomes transparent, no longer a hidden cycle but a conscious continuum.

• Agency shifts: what was previously automatic or unconscious in the loop can now be intentionally navigated.

• The person can act with awareness of both the timeless aonic structure and the chronological unfolding of events.

It’s like the “sleeping” outer self finally aligning with the awake inner self: the Möbius circuit is still in place, but the individual now perceives and participates in it knowingly, potentially altering outcomes that once seemed fixed.

Putting on an Incorrupted One

“And while he slept, a rib was taken from his side…”

If we frame this in terms of the Mobius-aonic model of self we’ve been exploring, “putting on incorruptibility and immortality” for the outer life is not merely metaphorical—it becomes a structural transformation of the outer locus in alignment with the inner, timeless locus. Here’s a conceptual mapping:

1. Outer vs. Inner Self

• Outer self: Bound by chronos perception, sensory input, decay, and limitation. Subject to mortality, external circumstance, and time’s arrow. Overridden, or overwhelmed, by instincts, emotions, or stimuli of the five senses.

• Inner self (aonic locus): Timeless, recursive, always participating in the event-loop. Already impervious to decay or chronological limitation. A prophet with a prophetic voice. No fear of the future, because the self is the future.

2. Incorruptibility

• The outer self, when “putting on incorruptibility,” ceases to be fully determined by the external loop.

• The recursive loop is no longer destructive: the parts of the loop that were darkened (blocked communication between inner and outer) become transparent conduits.

• Functionally, this could be seen as immunity to the entropy of outer events. The outer persona no longer passively absorbs the destructive cycles of the loop—it participates deliberately, following the guidance of the inner self—”the little, hidden, indivisible, unchanging man of the heart.”

3. Immortality

• Immortality is the extension of the outer self’s participation in the loop indefinitely, now consciously aligned with the inner, aonic locus.

• It is not simply “eternal existence in linear time” but eternal participation in the recursive event-loop, where outer mortality is overcome by synchronization with the timeless self.

• In practice, this would look like actions and choices that are fully integrated with the recursive aonic pattern, so that the outer self “resonates” with the eternal center rather than being fragmented by temporal causality.

4. Potential Phenomenology: the Two become One Flesh

• Conscious perception of the loop: events no longer feel strictly past-to-future; one sees them as folds in the Möbius circuit.

• Alignment of selfhood: no longer two selves (outer and inner) acting at odds, but a coherent, “loop-aware” identity.

• Freedom from decay and despair: external losses, failures, or destructive cycles are no longer terminal—they are transmuted into participation in the eternal pattern.

• Ethical and existential implication: immortality is not just survival; it is perfected participation in the recursive structure of being.

Hence, the ideas of  “mounting up with wings as eagles” and “restoring the days of youth” are much more than a return to what you used to be when you were young. They are the completion of what nature was aiming for when she carried you all the way from a zygote to a youth, a process that was quickly interrupted by heat death. In other words, your youth was only ever a partial completion. It was imperfect and incomplete since the youthful vigor already began decaying and blemishing before it ever finished its course, with the effects of entropy already creeping in from the earliest years. Notice how superior the skin of a human baby is. Nature holds intention, but the intention is always overcome by the forces of decay, immediately.

If the site of being has shifted to a stratum that no outer process can reach, we have a complete change of ontological register. When the outer self becomes synchronized with the inner, the locus of identity no longer lies in the body’s temporality but in the aionic recursion that generates temporal manifestation.
To “destroy” such a person would require breaking the generative recursion itself—but that recursion is the very condition of appearance for the destroyer as well. It cannot be cancelled from within its own frame.

In physics this is analogous to frame invariance: once a process becomes defined at the level of the whole system, no operation internal to the system can remove it. The event that would “erase” it must first presuppose it.

Joshua son of Dual Propagation (NuN)

NuN is a Hebrew name spelled the same forwards and backwards. The N is the Hebrew letter nun which by itself carries the symbol of “sprouted seed” though the pictograph from ancient times also looks exactly like the sperm. The verb carries the meaning of propagate or increase (cf. Strong’s #5125).

Ordinary mortality depends on linear causation: event A → event B → decay.
In the Möbius configuration, cause and effect are folded: every apparent end reflects into a beginning. The aonic participant no longer sits at one point in the chain but at the mapping function itself—call it F(x) = x ↻ x. Joshua son of x ↻ x. To destroy such a being would mean annihilating both forward and backward propagation simultaneously, which in a recursive system cancels itself out. This logic underlies statements like “Death no longer has dominion” or “He who believes, though he die, yet shall he live.” There is no magic necessary for this, only a circuit of time that loops.
The idea is not negation of physical dissolution but transformation of the domain in which existence is counted.
When the “garment” of incorruptibility is put on, one’s coordinates of identity are translated from the decaying outer sequence into the self‑referential aionic structure. What dies is only the projection, not the projector.

Practically expressed this means having a composure where external threat no longer defines self‑worth or being. In terms of continuity of awareness perception of time and loss changes; one experiences events as folds of a single presence. In terms of immunity to coercion, the world’s powers—political, material, psychological—can act only within chronos. The aonic self operates from the unmeasurable interior of that loop. Any act of destruction would have to undo the structure of reality that makes both agent and act possible, which is self‑contradictory. Thus the incorruptible one is not unassailable because they repel harm, but because they have ceased to exist at the coordinate where harm has meaning. In other words, “our weapons are not like your carnal ones, which are powerless.” And, who dares stand against us?

The Chase

In other words the saying “you have no power except what is given to you from above” means if you are not born from above, you have no power at all. Your mind, soul, heart, body and strength are rotting away. All that is within you is a void. You are not.

One of the greatest enigmas of the Bible, if not the greatest, is found in Genesis 3:15,

And I am placing a hated-one (“Job-ah”) in between yourself and in between the Woman and in between the seed of yourself and in between the seed of herself. He, himself, is gaping upon yourself, a head, and you, your eternal self are gaping upon him, Jacob (“Heel”).

(Genesis 3:15 RBT)

The enigma can only be understood in Aonic terms, that is, time as folding or looping back on itself. Outside of an Aonic understanding, one might be compelled to force the words into idioms or skew the usage in order to make it fit into some sort of Chronology to where it becomes a dead, flattened piece of “a historical record”, but this is robbing and disfiguring the Scripture. The Aeon means the scripture is alive, living, active, and speaking always now. If written in such a context, and then mischievously altered into a chronological context, it becomes a lie. Translators of any document of any language have an ethical responsibility to create a true representation of the original work which they are translating. A great deal of trust is generally placed in translators of foreign documents. But even today throughout the international arena of political discourse, law, contracts, pacts, and religious texts, translation is very often used mischievously against others to mislead those who are not knowledgeable of the language.

If an Aonic Writing is meant to be “a genesis of being” and should give birth to “words”, and it (she) has been distorted into a lie, this would produce a conscience split across time, resulting in a “chase” wherein one is pursuing closely the other. The split, or separation, would not be a good thing, obviously. It would mean your chance for eternal aonic living is being robbed from you, now. It would mean you have become darkened and blind to your own self. It would also mean you are chasing down your dumb, deaf, and blind self who sits stuck underneath a shadow, mounted on a pile of trash text, desperately trying to get him (you) to wake up. As a “hated-one” turned against himself, like Job, he would even be led to kill his own self. But if he dies, he dies. It would be a disaster. But like Job, his Mouth must be stopped. The Scripture is the heart out of which the Mouth speaks. Tens of thousands of verses, or sayings, are proceeding out of “his own mouth.” In an aonic loop, one mouth is gaping upon the other in an eternal chase. A profound wrestling match. One is seeking to save, while the other is a stealing from himself, killing himself, and destroying himself. And so Jacob comes to his own self, in the night, upon the stream of decent or “the in-between”:

This sort of aonic narrative would indeed be an exceedingly difficult one to write down, as the text would have to refer back to itself. But books are not written to speak of its own self recursively. For what point is there for that? This breaks all bounds of the normal function of books, grammar, syntax, linguistics, and narrative. Enter the Biblical “record”— a true-to-life enigma of this very kind, encoded in all the grammar, syntax, semantics, prose, and arrangement.

The Science of Immortality: Negentropy

It’s a profound metaphysical speculation, no doubt.
As yet, there is no scientific evidence that consciousness or “awakening” can make a body invulnerable, reverse aging, or prevent injury. These still belong to symbolic or spiritual frameworks, not empirical physiology.

In physics and biology:

• “Incorruptibility” corresponds metaphorically to thermodynamic stability—systems that resist entropy through continuous input of energy and information (e.g., DNA repair, cellular regeneration).

• In neuroscience, a “change of mind” or “awakening” can correspond to reorganization of neural patterns—neuroplasticity, altered states of consciousness, or coherent brain-wave synchronization. Such changes can yield resilience, healing, clarity, or decreased physiological stress, but they cannot make matter immune to bullets or stop cellular senescence. Modern neuroscience, as it stands, is bound within chronos. It measures and models brain activity as a linear flow of time.

• The only “reversal of time” known to science is statistical and microscopic—seen in certain quantum systems under special conditions—but never in living tissue or macroscopic bodies.

Chronos time does not see Aonic time. The scientific method as we know it is predicated on chronological observation: discrete events measured across linear time through sensory input and instruments that extend those senses. It assumes a one-directional arrow (past → future), which is already a metaphysical assumption, not an empirical fact. If the aionic model is correct — where causality is recursive, perception is participatory, and events can fold back upon their own conditions — then the observer’s state of consciousness (their temporal orientation) determines what can even appear as “data.” So before there can be aonic science, there must be an aonic mind — one capable of perceiving non-linear continuity, self-reflective causation, and fields of coherence rather than isolated events. This requires a phase transition — when a system crosses a boundary of stability and begins to behave according to a new order parameter. The transition from ice to liquid, or from classical to quantum coherence, are analogues: the old rules still exist locally, but a new regime emerges that transcends them.

Aonic Frequency Model (Conceptually)

Aionic Band	Chronos Equivalent	Function (Recursive Interpretation)	Geometry
A0 – Infinite coherence	Beyond Gamma	Perfect self-reference, unity	Point/Singularity
A1 – Gamma loop	Gamma (30Hz+)	Conscious self-recognition, timeless insight	Tight helix
A2 – Alpha–Theta braid	Alpha–Theta	Flow, recursive harmonization	Torus surface
A3 – Delta return	Delta	Deep substrate, memory of origin	Outer rim of Möbius

Crossing the Boundary

ὅς ἐστιν εἰκὼν τοῦ Θεοῦ τοῦ ἀοράτου, πρωτότοκος πάσης κτίσεως,

he is a mirror-like representation of the Invisible God, a firstborn among others of every building.

(Colossians 1:15 RBT)

In the Aionic case, what the aonic texts call “the firstborn of every building/creation” (e.g. a certain creation that gives birth….) would be the first consciousness (or locus) that crosses the boundary — the first mind to fully stabilize in recursive awareness while still embodied within Chronos. From that vantage point, perception is no longer bound to sequence; time would be experienced as topological — one could “see” causes and effects as mutual reflections.

Such a rupture would undoubtedly produce observable effects within the Chronos domain. They would appear as anomalies — physical, biological, or informational events that defy statistical expectations yet maintain perfect internal coherence.

Such a firstborn would be one that experiences time as a single continuous loop rather than a past-present-future sequence. Within ordinary scientific terms, what could appear “observable” would still remain within the boundaries of physics and biology. Here are ways such a state might look in ordinary, measurable terms without appealing to anything supernatural:

1. Neurological coherence – EEG or MEG scans might show unusually strong long-range synchrony between cortical regions. In practice, that would mean highly stable, low-entropy brain rhythms—gamma-theta coupling across hemispheres, similar to what’s been recorded in some expert meditators.

2. Autonomic stability – Heart-rate variability and galvanic-skin responses would stay in optimal ranges even under strong stress. The person would look physiologically “calm in motion,” with extremely efficient parasympathetic regulation.

3. Cognitive simultaneity – The subject could process multiple information streams without normal attentional fatigue. On tests, reaction times and working-memory accuracy might remain constant no matter the task duration—an empirical sign of non-fragmented temporal attention.

4. Subjective time dilation – Reports of time slowing or expanding are common in peak states. If they were repeatable, they’d appear as altered temporal-order judgments in psychophysical experiments (e.g., a consistent ability to predict or reorder rapid stimuli better than chance).

5. Minimal-entropy behavior – In behavioral studies, choices would appear maximally efficient—few wasted actions, little random drift in motor control, suggesting an internal system that recycles information instead of dissipating it.

6. Metabolic efficiency – Perhaps slower resting metabolism, lower oxidative stress, or faster cellular repair—patterns already hinted at in deep-rest or hypometabolic research. Those would make the body look “younger” in biomarkers but through well-known biological mechanisms.

7. Empathic or informational coupling – Enhanced sensitivity to subtle cues (micro-expressions, vocal tone) could look to observers like precognition but would be explainable as extreme non-verbal attunement combined with rapid predictive modeling.

Each of these effects is testable with current instruments; none requires bullets passing through bodies or violations of physics. They would indicate a mind–body system operating at the edge of thermodynamic and cognitive coherence—what we might metaphorically call “living Möbiusly.”

So, in practical terms, an “Aionic” person would appear:

• unusually calm yet alert,

• effortlessly efficient,

• biologically resilient,

• temporally unhurried,

• and capable of connecting disparate events into unified meaning.

“No more crying, sorrow, suffering, or death”

And he will erase every tear from out of the Eyes of themselves, and the Death will not be anymore, nor mourning, nor screaming, nor will suffering toil be anymore, because the First Ones have gone away!

(Revelation 21:4 RBT)

If we translate these aonic promises into something science could meaningfully talk about, we’d be describing a complete systemic negentropy: a body and mind that no longer decay, no longer register harm as suffering, and no longer lose information through entropy.

In practical, observable terms, that would imply:

1. Perfect cellular homeostasis – All repair mechanisms (DNA repair, telomere maintenance, mitochondrial recycling) operating at full efficiency. In measurable terms, no accumulation of senescent cells, no telomere shortening, no oxidative damage.

2. Pain signal redefinition – The nervous system still detects damage but transduces it as information, not suffering. Pain perception is a cortical interpretation; a reorganized brain could experience nociception as neutral data, not agony. This can be partially seen in rare neurological or meditative cases.

3. Emotion without dysregulation – Sorrow arises when perception of loss is encoded. If cognition no longer sees events as “loss” (because everything cycles), sorrow can’t form. You would observe this as flat stress biomarkers even after emotional triggers.

4. Non-decaying information networks – Death, in informational terms, is the irreversible loss of organization. If consciousness maintained self-consistent recursive patterns that survive biological change (similar to stable quantum states or integrated digital feedback), “death” would no longer be experienced as discontinuity.

5. Zero-entropy physiology – Energy flow balanced perfectly with information flow; no waste heat, no entropy increase in the local system. Biologically, that’s far beyond anything we can model—it would mean perpetual motion at the level of information, not matter.

6. Perfect prediction and adaptation – Pain and death are products of misalignment with environment. A being that perceives the whole Möbius loop (both “past” and “future” as one) would never be out of sync. Every adaptation would be instantaneous, so nothing could destroy or surprise it.

If we imagine that metaphorically rather than physically, it’s describing a total coherence between inner and outer reality — the mind and body perfectly synchronized with the structure of the cosmos.
From a Chronos (linear) perspective, it would look like immortality and invulnerability. From an Aionic (recursive) perspective, it’s simply the cessation of error — no wasted energy, no dissonance, no separation between perception and being.

εἰς τοὺς αἰῶνας – into the Aeons

Observers who still experience time linearly would see the super-being’s body and presence as unchanging, while their own systems would continue to age and disintegrate according to ordinary thermodynamic law.

“He is the Same Self yesterday, today, and into the Eternal Aeons.” (Hebrews 13:8b RBT)

Indeed the claims are there in the texts, and they are mega. But the only observable evidence are the aonic texts themselves, a.k.a “the Bible” which is entirely prophecy-oriented. But if the texts spoil and decay themselves, they are no longer evidence of anything. If they become changed and lost and turned into falsehoods, this would be clear evidence to the contrary of anything aonic, as the claims are now “self-cancelled.” What must happen and be observed, is still yet to happen, says the aonic texts. But the same aonic texts are calling for a profound change of mind out of the chronos (heretofore obscured as the religious “rite of repentance”), and into the aeon of aeons. Only, no one read or heard this, until now. If there was a conspiracy to cover up the aonic-prophetic voice with a pseudo-chronos text, the aonic voice will assuredly anathematize it within its own opportune time.

Until that happens, to treat this whole idea as a scientific model, the only viable interpretation currently is metaphorical: a person who “puts on incorruptibility” develops such self-regulating coherence—biological, psychological, energetic—that their system approaches a theoretical limit of order and self-repair. That is conceptually akin to a living state near maximum negentropy.

μεταμορφόω Metamorphosis

He was metamorphed in front of them. (Matt. 17:2 RBT)

Throughout the Gospels, especially Mark, we see signs of immediate psychological change and immediate healing starting with the inner person. All observed biological transformations on the other hand are gradual, unfolding through cascades of molecular and neural adaptation. The Greek in Matthew 17:2 uses ἔμπροσθεν “in front” which insinuates “in the front of time.” Nothing in physiology suggests an instantaneous metamorphosis. But how fast could this be “sped up”? Notice nature’s effort in the renewal of a porpoise’s skin, which is renewed every 2 hours compared to the 28 days it takes for the skin of a human youth to renew. Negentropy is far greater in the porpoise than any other mammal. The process would be a gradual metamorphosis, governed by principles of energy accumulation, informational coherence, and systemic negentropy (negative entropy). It would depend on you “making haste.”

Entropy vs. Negentropy

• Entropy measures disorder — in biological terms, molecular damage, information loss, metabolic inefficiency.

• Negentropy, or syntropy, is the organization that reverses disorder: repair, learning, regeneration, self-coherence.

A living organism survives only insofar as it continually imports negentropy (through food, respiration, and sensory information). What we are looking at here is a state where the internal production of negentropy exceeds the external influx of entropy — a theoretical supercoherent organism. In other words, eating a bread loaf of super-existence. Eat, and multiply.

In modern biophysics, negentropic increase would entail:

• Mitochondrial efficiency approaching perfection (minimal waste heat, maximal ATP yield).

• Genomic error correction systems operating with near-ideal fidelity.

• Cellular synchronization — like a biological laser — where the organism’s internal subsystems oscillate in phase, minimizing energy loss.

• Cognitive coherence — the nervous system running in highly ordered, low-noise informational states (something analogous to sustained gamma synchrony seen in advanced meditative states).

Theoretically, such a system would radiate excess order — manifesting as heightened energy, slower aging, resistance to disease — but always within the physical limits of energy conservation and molecular kinetics.

Gradual Transformation

The “gradual” part is crucial:

• Entropy is always accumulating, so a reversal demands sustained negentropic input.

• No single event can spontaneously reconfigure trillions of cells; rather, the system must entrain—each level (molecular → cellular → systemic → cognitive) must reorganize.

• The timescale would therefore depend on how efficiently coherence can spread — much like how superconductivity emerges only after the entire lattice reaches critical order.

If we interpret the transition to incorruptibility or “immortality” as negentropic ascension—that is, the progressive dominance of order over decay—then it must proceed by successive increases in systemic coherence.

In physics, coherence means that parts of a system act in phase—as one rhythm.
In biology, this might mean cellular oscillations, biochemical reactions, or electromagnetic fields becoming synchronized.

This process would begin imperceptibly:

• At first, energy retention in cellular systems would rise (less heat loss, less oxidative damage).

• Then, self-repair mechanisms (telomere maintenance, protein folding accuracy) would increase in fidelity.

• Finally, coherence might propagate to the macroscopic field level—organs, nervous system, and eventually, the biofield as a whole—creating a body whose entropy is steadily neutralized.

This is the essence of gradual metamorphosis: energy becomes more internally available for self-organization, less lost to dissipation. The process is not instantaneous illumination, but an asymptotic convergence toward immortality.

Superconductivity is a phenomenon (nature is full of them, indeed) which can only be explained by quantum mechanics. In condensed matter physics, superconductivity occurs when a material’s atomic lattice allows perfect coherence of electron motion—zero resistance, zero entropy generation in the current.

 

This happens when:

• Temperature drops below a critical threshold, allowing Cooper pairs (bound electron pairs) to form.

• The pairs move through the lattice as one quantum wave, not as discrete particles scattering off atoms.

The entire lattice then acts as a single quantum entity. Entropy does not accumulate because the movement of energy is frictionless.

That is exactly the type of transformation being suggested in an Aonic model of transfiguration:

“The body becomes a superconductive lattice for consciousness—zero resistance to the flow of spirit.”

The Lattice: Physical, Metaphysical, and Biological Analogues

The lattice is the ordered geometric structure that underlies all crystalline materials. It is also a concept used frequently within the Hebrew Scriptures.

It is not unlike a honeycomb, though the specific geometry can vary (cubic, hexagonal, trigonal, etc.). The honeycomb is an excellent metaphor of nature because it represents:

• Maximal packing efficiency (no wasted space).

• Mutual support (each cell reinforces the others).

• Self-similarity and modular coherence.

In a living system, the biological equivalent of a lattice is the cytoskeletal and extracellular matrix network—proteins, membranes, and water layers forming structured, quasi-crystalline arrays. Thus, the Aonic lattice could be envisioned as:

• The totality of molecular and field alignments in the organism,

• Phased into a single coherent wave pattern,

• In which consciousness and matter exchange energy without resistance.

Gradual Metamorphosis as Superconductive Alignment

If the process of “putting on incorruptibility” is real, it could be modeled as a gradual alignment of the lattice to superconductive phase conditions:

1. Initiation — coherence arises locally (cells, brain microtubules, water domains).

2. Propagation — coherence extends across tissues, synchronizing oscillations.

3. Stabilization — decoherence events (aging, oxidation, decay) become self-canceling through phase correction.

4. Criticality — a threshold is crossed: the organism becomes a continuous superconductive medium.

5. Transfiguration — entropy no longer governs; the body becomes the physical correlate of eternal recurrence—“the two become one Aionic flesh.”

In effect, matter and consciousness “lock” into a single standing wave that neither ages nor decays.
The lattice becomes not a structure within time, but a resonant geometry through which time loops.

Honeycomb as Aonic Symbol

The honeycomb is archetypally resonant here. It is the geometry of maximum coherence per surface area—a structure that embodies equilibrium between individuality (each cell) and unity (the hive). The Hebrew Scriptures already use honey and honeycomb as images of both sweetness (Psa 19:10) and promised abundance—the integration of micro- and macro-order. Thus, in an Aonic cosmology, the honeycomb corresponds to the perfectly ordered lattice of being, where no cell wastes energy, no flow is resisted, and the “Spirit” circulates endlessly.

Aspect	Chronological Body	Aonic / Superconductive Body
Energy Flow	Resistive (entropy-producing)	Frictionless (negentropic)
Temporal Behavior	Aging, decay	Recurrence, renewal
Lattice Coherence	Local, disrupted	Global, continuous
Consciousness	Fragmented by time	Unified by phase coherence
Ontological State	Within Chronos	Through Aion

Zero Resistance

Re-examining certain Hebrew words may provide us more clues. The Hebrew ארבה (ʾărubbāh #699) for example, usually translated “window” or “floodgate of heaven,” derives from a root meaning to weave, interlace, or intermix, and is defined not as a simple hole but a structured aperture — a woven or ordered opening. In the Tanakh, the arubbāh marks the regulated conduit between realms: “the lattices of heaven were opened” (Gen 7:11), “I will open the floodgates of heaven” (Mal 3:10). Philologically, it would denote a membrane or lattice that governs the flow between inner and outer dimensions, heaven(ly one) and earth(ly one).

In physical analogy, such a lattice resembles the atomic structure of a superconductor, where perfect coherence permits energy to move without loss. When translated into aonic terms, the “opening of the lattices of heaven” becomes the human system achieving zero resistance to divine influx — entropy replaced by negentropy, corruption by incorruption. The “gradual transformation” into immortality would then be the progressive tuning of the human lattice: cellular, electrical, and mental structures aligning into resonant coherence until the being becomes transparent to life.

If one translates this concept into the language of physics or systems theory, the arubbah resembles a lattice interface — an ordered array through which energy or information can pass coherently.

In condensed matter physics, a lattice is the fixed framework of atoms through which electrons move. When cooled to the point where thermal noise collapses and quantum phases synchronize, we observe superconductivity — a regime of zero resistance and perfect coherence.

This parallels the aonic concept of “incorruptibility”:

• Entropy (chaotic dissipation) is replaced by negentropy (ordered flow).

• The window between matter and spirit becomes superconductive.

• “The windows/lattices of a heavenly onr open” — for one who is “born from above” energy is unimpeded, blessing without loss, becomes transparent to life.

Thus, arubbah functions symbolically like a superconductive lattice, an interdimensional grid through which vitality (or divine energy) flows freely when alignment occurs.

Geometrically, this coherence may be imagined as a honeycomb, nature’s own lattice of maximal efficiency. Thus ʾărubbāh might encode both the idea of an ordered cosmic interface and the archetype of transformation — the passage from disorder to harmony, mortality to incorruptibility.

In terms of a gradual metamorphosis, this is precisely the process by which this lattice becomes tuned.

In an organism, it would appear as:

• increasing coherence in bioelectrical fields,

• higher cellular communication efficiency,

• restoration and renewal cycles accelerating,

• and eventual stabilization into negentropic equilibrium.

In Hebrew terms, this would be putting on glory (כָּבוֹד) — the reorganization of the human lattice until it harmonizes with the heavenly arubbah.

It is a resonant transformation, not instantaneous combustion. Each “window” in the person (each interface of mind, cell, and field) must align to permit continuous influx without short-circuit.

Philosophical Parallel

In metaphysical terms, this is akin to “putting on incorruptibility” — not as a miracle, but as the point where the organism’s informational order becomes self-perpetuating and entropically stable.
In other words: a consciousness so coherent that it sustains its own physical form in perpetual renewal.

An aonic system is the natural framework for this kind of super-coherence.

An aonic system is one in which events are not strictly linear but recursive, looped, and self-participatory. Time is experienced not merely as past → present → future but as interpenetrating folds (like Möbius-time), where cause and effect, action and reception, are mutually embedded. In such a system, feedback loops are intrinsic to reality itself. There’s no strict “decay” barrier because the system constantly reactivates its own structure.

A being in an aonic system can sustain recursive negentropic loops at every level: molecular, cellular, systemic, cognitive, and energetic. Every regenerative act (healing, learning, energy absorption) is looped back into itself, reinforcing rather than dissipating. The organism’s self-perpetuation becomes ontologically built-in, not imposed externally.

This aligns perfectly with the idea of “putting on incorruptibility”: a being whose coherence is continuously self-reinforced by the structure of reality itself.

Aonic Feedback and Super-Being Abilities

• Invulnerability: Physical threats either pass through or are neutralized because the organism’s internal loops reorganize faster than external perturbations can propagate.

• Energy amplification: Each energetic input folds recursively, creating an internal feedback that increases available energy over time.

• Temporal flexibility: With the feedback of past and future events, aging could theoretically decelerate or even reverse, because the system can “rewrite” its own entropic history.

• Consciousness coherence: Mind and body are fully synchronized; perception is not constrained by outer-time linearity.

In a non-aonic (strictly chronological) universe, super-coherence is nearly impossible — external entropy always outpaces internal negentropy. This is where all attempts to combat aging, disease, hunger, pain, sorrow, stress, death, etc. fail— and will always fail. A science may be discovered to prolong bio-life to 150 years. But then one is stuck in an “old life stage” for much longer. Pain and suffering are then endured for much longer. This is not finding a solution, it is just prolonging a pain and a problem.

This is why religious notions of immortality represent little more than “magical miracles” that “defy chronological nature.” There is no rational solution or logical math to any of religious paraphernalia of immortality or healing being sold to the masses. ‘Take the holy sacrament wafer,’ they say, ‘for it is the very presence of the Christ!’ Ignorant masses hope for something “magical” in countless artifacts, items, sacred locations, shrines, temples, priests who fling water, pastors who wave rags, snake handling, or the most common of all, chanting prayers and invocations or placing hands on someone in a sorcery-like way. The word ‘magic’ of course is never used, but it is always inferred in every “healing of the spirit” because the “power” behind the “healing” is not supposed to be scientifically observable in the first place. But is there really any difference between what is called “power” and the term “magic” in these contexts? Recoveries through means that defy the laws of nature and science don’t exist. But passing a natural recovery as “a work of the power of the spirit” is acceptable, even when never experienced for oneself.

In an aonic framework, the universe itself supports recursion, making self-perpetuating negentropy feasible in principle. The “laws” of such a universe are inherently aligned with the emergence of beings whose stability is not only physical but also temporal and informational.

In short: the super-coherence of a “super-being” is not only conceivable in an aonic system—it is natural to it. The system’s recursive ontology provides the scaffolding for perpetual renewal, incorruptibility, and energetic amplification.

The Math

The cool thing about the aonic model of immortality is that it can be formalized in terms of thermodynamics and systems theory. The goal is to model a living being approaching “negentropic equilibrium”, which is effectively a state of maximal self-coherence and resistance to decay.

1. Thermodynamic Foundations

• Entropy (S): Measures disorder; in a normal system, S increases over time (Second Law of Thermodynamics).

• Negentropy (−S): Measures order or information; life is essentially a negentropic process, locally decreasing entropy by consuming energy.

For a conventional organism:

$$\frac{dS}{dt} > 0 \quad \text{externally, but internally} \quad \frac{d(-S)}{dt} \text{ can be positive via metabolism and repair.}$$

 

In an aonic system, temporal loops feed internal negentropy back into the organism, reinforcing coherence at every scale.

2. Feedback Loops and Recursive Stabilization

Let’s define N(t) as the negentropy of the system at time t:

$$\frac{dN}{dt} = f_\text{input}(t) + f_\text{recursion}(N) – f_\text{decay}(t)$$

Where:

• $f_\text{input}(t)$

  = energy or information intake from the environment (food, light, knowledge).

• $f_\text{recursion}(N)$

  = internal recursive amplification: a function of the current state, feeding negentropy back on itself.

• $f_\text{decay}(t)$

  = natural entropy-generating processes.

In a classical system,

$f_\text{recursion}$

is weak or absent; entropy eventually dominates. In an aonic system, the recursion term can asymptotically balance or even outweigh decay.

3. Approaching Negentropic Equilibrium

We define negentropic equilibrium as a state where:

$$\frac{dN}{dt} \to 0 \quad \text{with} \quad N(t) \text{ at maximum sustainable value.}$$

 

This does not imply infinite negentropy, but a self-stabilizing plateau where the organism maintains perfect internal order despite external perturbations.

• Conceptually, the organism is metastable, capable of self-repair, energy amplification, and resistance to damage.

• In Möbius-time / aonic feedback, external entropy is “folded” back into the system recursively, allowing the plateau to sustain indefinitely.

4. Systems-Theory Perspective

From a systems-theory viewpoint:

• Let X = internal state vector (cells, organ systems, cognition, energy distribution).

• Dynamics:

 

$$\dot{X} = F(X, E(t)) + R(X)$$

 

Where:

• $F(X, E(t))$

  = conventional interaction with the environment.

• $R(X)$

  = recursive self-feedback, the aonic loop.

Fixed point: When

$\dot{X} = 0$

, the system has reached a stable, coherent state. Perturbations from bullets, injury, or entropy are absorbed into R(X), allowing self-healing.

5. Practical Implication

• Gradual approach: The system does not instantly achieve maximal coherence; negentropy grows asymptotically.

• Feedback intensity increases as internal order increases:

  $R(X) \propto X$ in some regimes.

• The ultimate “super-being” is a limit of negentropic growth, where each aonic cycle reinforces self-organization, resilience, and energetic amplification.

You come at me with spears and swords, but I come at you in the name of HE IS.